Click logo to go to County homepagePlanning and Development Energy Division  
 [  You Are Here:  County Home : Planning & Development Home : Energy Home : Natural Oil Seep Inventory ]
Site Search
Contact Us
 Energy Division Home
 Announcements
 Who We Are
 Oil & Gas Facilities Map
 Projects
 Permit Compliance
 Policies, Rulemaking
 Mitigation Programs
 Interagency Activities
MMS/Tri-County
Forum
Decommissioning
Working Group
Natural Oil Seep
Inventory
Oil Spill Contingency
Plan
Hard Substrate
Process
Seismic Survey
Process
Shoreline Inventory
 Information
 Links to Other Sites
 Website Page Links
end-section divider

In case of an oil
spill or gas release:

Call 911

Facility Operators
must also call:

Governor's Office of
Emergency Services
1-800-645-7911


Energy Division
(805)886-7165


Click here for other
reporting requirements



Click here for normal
business hours contacts
 

Natural Oil Seep Inventory

Santa Barbara County is situated adjacent to two offshore basins: the Santa Maria Basin, which is offshore of the northern coast of the County, and the Santa Barbara-Ventura Basin, which forms the Santa Barbara Channel. Both basins contain natural oil and gas seeps, and both are sites of offshore oil and gas development. The natural seepage leaves deposits of oil residues along the County's coastline, typically in the form of "tar balls." Seeps in the Santa Barbara Channel have been studied more thoroughly than those in the Santa Maria Basin, and rough estimates exist for Channel seep volumes. .

Offshore oil development carries a significant risk of oil spills that can also leave oil residues on the County's coastline. Oil spills from offshore oil projects adversely impacted the coastal and marine environment of the County in 1969 and 1997. A large number of small spills also occur, most of which probably have little impact. According to the Minerals Management Service (MMS) database, a total of 841 spills were reported in the Pacific Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Region between 1969 and 1999, of which 95% were less than 1 barrel (42 gallons). An important distinction between natural seeps and major oil spills is that seeps are distributed over a large region and throughout the year, whereas spills are concentrated in both space and time.

When an offshore oil spill fouls the coastal environment, the operator has responsibilities under state and federal law, and under County permit conditions, for spill cleanup, resource restoration, and environmental damages. However, assessment of shoreline impacts is complicated by the ubiquitous presence on beaches of oil residues originating in natural seeps. Because the precise chemical composition of oil varies among oil reservoirs, oil originating in natural seeps can be differentiated from spilled oil by chemical fingerprinting of oil from both seeps and wells. Similarly, a baseline inventory of shoreline tar deposits can be developed by sampling and chemical fingerprinting of tar found along the shore. Such an inventory would facilitate determining the source of shoreline contamination. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) has previously undertaken preliminary reconnaissance of the coastal tar residues, comparing collected samples with a small set of reference crude oils. Most of these samples appeared to originate in natural offshore seeps.

In 2001 the USGS and MMS began a three-year, $900,000 project to examine natural seepage in the southern Santa Maria Basin. Work during the first year focused on assessing existing information and shoreline sampling of tar deposits. Work in year two involved surveys to locate offshore seeps in the study area, chemical characterization of onshore tar samples, and development of statistical methods for differentiating tar samples. Progress was made in building the tar fingerprint library and construction of a GIS that brings together in a spatial database many sources of data on offshore seep locations, together with other data layers, such as bathymetry and geology. In the third year, USGS will sample tar at offshore seeps, using divers and remotely operated vehicles (ROVs). Researchers in the USGS laboratory will concentrate on refining their strategy for discriminating tar from different sources and will work to develop a better picture of the beach tar deposition data.

In spring, 2002, the County of Santa Barbara received funding from the California Coastal Resources Grant Program to participate in the project. The Energy Division participation consists of beach tar sampling and support for USGS laboratory analysis of the additional tar samples generated. With the state funding, we have been able to increase the number of beaches sampled from 4 to 10, increase the sampling frequency from quarterly to monthly, and extend sampling period for a full year. The funding also covers laboratory costs for analysis of the additional samples, including support for a laboratory technician in USGS’ Menlo Park laboratory, employed full-time for 14 months to analyze tar samples, perform statistical analyses, and maintain the tar database. The enhanced sampling program will allow USGS to learn more about the sources of beach tar and to develop a better estimate of how much tar is present on the beaches throughout the year.

The Energy Division has now completed its beach tar sampling program, which ran from June, 2002, to May, 2003. Beach tar was sampled monthly at ten beaches spaced out along Santa Barbara’s coast, from Brown’s beach, near the San Luis County line, to Loon Point, near Carpinteria. The sampling was carried out by two field teams of three students from the Department of Geology at U.C.S.B., coordinated by John Day, a Planner in the Energy Division. The sampling methodology was developed in cooperation with the USGS, following their established protocol. Tar deposition was estimated by weighing the tar found along transects positioned at random locations along the beaches, and tar samples were collected for chemical analysis. During the year, the field teams weighed tar at nearly 600 transects and collected over 300 tar samples for analysis. In excess of 182 samples have now been analyzed in the USGS laboratory.

The USGS researcher team completed analyses of the tar deposition data in March, 2004. The findings are likely to be augmented or revised in the future, depending on additional data and new information that may come to light during the final year of the USGS study (or possibly extensions to that study). The USGS submitted a provisional final report for the County-funded project on March 25, bringing our joint undertaking to a close. Following completion of the MMS-funded project later this year, the USGS will complete a final report on the overall project and submit papers to professional journals for peer review and publication.

The study provides a solid basis for evaluating the potential value of follow-on studies of beach tar. It also will inform the design of future studies.

For additional information on this project and results, please follow the links to Natural Seep Project Summary and the Natural Seep Inventory Final Report.

Please contact Dr. John Day, (805) 568-2045 for more information.

 

 

 
end of page content

Top