Click logo to go to County homepagePlanning and Development Energy Division  
 [  You Are Here:  County Home : Planning & Development Home : Energy Home : Federal Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing ]
Site Search
Contact Us
 Energy Division Home
 Announcements
 Who We Are
 Oil & Gas Facilities Maps
 Projects
 Onshore Permitting &
Inspection
 Permit Compliance
 Mitigation Programs
 Interagency Activities
 Information
Fact Sheets
Informational Papers
Glossary
 Links to Other Sites
end-section divider

In case of an oil
spill or gas release:

Call 911

Facility Operators
must also call:

Governor's Office of
Emergency Services
1-800-645-7911


Energy Division
(805)568-2519


Click here for other
reporting requirements



Click here for normal
business hours contacts
 

Precursor to OCS Oil & Gas Leasing Offshore California

By 1947, advances in drilling technology enabled oil companies to drill wells from offshore platforms. As a result, an intense jurisdictional struggle ensued between the federal government and coastal states over the governance of submerged offshore lands. Revenue was at the heart of this struggle since both the federal and state governments receive money when they lease submerged lands to oil companies for oil and gas exploration.

In 1953, Congress passed the Submerged Lands Act and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA). The Submerged Lands Act separated federal and state jurisdiction (and revenue rights) of submerged lands at three miles from shore. The states retained jurisdiction for "tideland" areas up to three miles from shore. The OCSLA authorized the Secretary of the Interior to lease tracts of submerged lands on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) for oil and gas development, collect revenues from leasing activity, and prescribe regulations that prevent the waste of OCS natural resources.

In 1965, the United States Supreme Court ruled on California's claim that the water between Santa Barbara County's mainland and the Channel Islands should be considered "inland" water under the jurisdiction of the State. The Court did not agree and upheld the federal government's jurisdiction over all waters seaward of the State's three-mile jurisdictional limit in the water of the Santa Barbara Channel. Following this ruling, the federal government began preparing to lease submerged tracts of land in the Santa Barbara Channel.


 

 
end of page content

Top