P&D Home
Applications, Forms & Documents
Boards, Commissions, & Committees
Permit Information
Projects & Programs
P&D Divisions
Agricultural Land Use Planning
Building & Safety
Energy
Long Range Planning
|
|
Back to Process Improvement History
Steering Group 1: The Nature of the Interaction
|
Charter
The sooner we can
provide needed information to potential applicants, the better able
they will be to ensure their proposals meet policy and ordinance
standards. Types of improvements that could be considered
include, for example: that all policies, application forms,
handouts, and other relevant documents be placed on our web site; that
we open up the entire process, routinely meeting with and listening to
interested individuals and groups; and that we develop and make
available interpretive information material on key policy issues,
process steps, etc.
Reducing the conflict and,
wherever possible, eliminating it. The
conflict tends to arise because there are differing perspectives and
objectives, paired with high stakes. The areas of common interest
far outweigh the differences, however. By building on those areas
of common interest, we can find collaborative solutions, not
compromises. When conflict does occur, we need to manage it
better, so that it: is at a high, conceptual level (e.g., what is
reasonable development of a constrained lot); is as early in the
process as possible; is conducted professionally; and achieves positive
outcomes.
Improving training of staff,
applicants, and agents>— we need to be
providing just-in-time training to everyone involved, in all key
concepts, on the changes that are occurring, and identifying the
resolution of identified problems. P&D will provide training
in our ordinances and policies and their interpretation; local
architects and planning consultants, among others, can provide us
reciprocal training in design issues and related matters.
Restructure the interaction so that all parties work to develop and
implement alternatives that achieve all parties’ objectives to the
extent possible, and spend our time, energy, and the applicants’ money
realizing projects the most closely satisfy all objectives. |
|
Meetings |
|
August 25, 2003 |
September 3, 2003 |
September 17, 2003 |
October
1, 2003 |
October 15, 2003 |
November 5, 2003 |
November 19, 2003 |
December 3, 2003 |
January 21, 2004 |
March 3, 2004 |
| March 17, 2004 |
|
Back to Process Improvement History
|
Note: Many of our documents and pages require Adobe® Reader® or
equivalent on your computer.
|
|
|